The Relationship Between Knowledge Level and Long-Term Contraceptive Method Selection in Family Planning Acceptors

Authors

  • Alda Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ni Made Dwi Mahayati Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ni Wayan Ariyani Poltekkes Kemenkes Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70610/jcpa.2169

Keywords:

Knowledge Level; Contraceptive Selection; Long Acting Contraceptive Methods; Family Planning Acceptors

Abstract

The utilization of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods (LARCs) in Denpasar City remains lower than that of non-LARC methods. This study aimed to determine the relationship between knowledge level and the selection of LARCs among family planning acceptors at UPTD Puskesmas IV Denpasar Selatan. This analytical correlational study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted from April to May 2026. A total of 46 family planning acceptors were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using a valid and reliable knowledge questionnaire and analyzed using the Chi-Square test. The results showed that most respondents had a low level of knowledge (47.8%). Equal proportions of respondents used LARCs and non-LARC methods (50% each). Respondents with a low level of knowledge were more likely to use LARCs, whereas those with a good level of knowledge tended to choose non-LARC methods. Statistical analysis revealed a significant relationship between knowledge level and the selection of LARCs (p = 0.044). It can be concluded that knowledge level was significantly associated with the selection of LARCs among family planning acceptors at UPTD Puskesmas IV Denpasar Selatan. Continuous education on LARCs should be strengthened while considering other factors that may influence contraceptive choice.

Published

2026-10-18

How to Cite

Alda, Ni Made Dwi Mahayati, & Ni Wayan Ariyani. (2026). The Relationship Between Knowledge Level and Long-Term Contraceptive Method Selection in Family Planning Acceptors. Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA), 4(02), 3695–3706. https://doi.org/10.70610/jcpa.2169