Social Innovation of the Climate Village Program (Proklim) as a Community-Based Waste Management Effort to Improve Welfare in Pesanggrahan, Madiun City

Authors

  • Sukmayadevi Sukmayadevi PT. Pertamina Patra Niaga Fuel Terminal Madiun, Indonesia
  • Lintang Akbar PT. Pertamina Patra Niaga Fuel Terminal Madiun, Indonesia
  • Diaz Kurnia Pentasandi PT. Pertamina Patra Niaga Fuel Terminal Madiun, Indonesia
  • Shinta Tris Irawati Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70610/iare.1311

Keywords:

Climate Village Program (Proklim), Community-Based Waste Management, Community Welfare, Social Innovation

Abstract

The Climate Village Program (Proklim) is a concrete form of climate change mitigation efforts in the form of active actions to prevent or slow down the occurrence of climate change packaged in a community empowerment program. The purpose of the Pesanggrahan Proklim community service activity is to empower the community carried out by a group of people in the RW XI Pesanggrahan area, Taman Village. This community service method uses the Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach. The field findings show that Pesanggrahan Proklim is a social innovation carried out through the following schemes: 1) Waste management as the main point through sorting waste according to each category. 2) Conversion of organic waste into agricultural inputs in the form of compost. 3) Establishment of yard farming for food security. 4) Biofloc fish farming as a source of protein. 5) Economic and sustainable integration through waste banks. Another social innovation is seen in the management of the waste bank cycle through the digitalization of "SOKROSOK". Pesanggrahan Proklim has succeeded in creating various income streams for the group by converting waste into economic assets. Proklim social innovation has a social impact in improving the economy and environment, thereby encouraging sustainable development.

References

Behavioral Economics The effects of monetary incentives and environmental information nudges on household waste sorting behavior: Experimental evidence from community-based waste banks in Indonesia. (2026). Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 232, 108991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2026.108991

Carron, A., Bray, S. R., & Eys, M. (2002). Team cohesion and team succes in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041023 17200828

Circular Economy Gibovic, D., & Bikfalvi, A. (2025). Informing scalability for social innovation: Evidence from a recycling initiative. Waste Management & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X251345349

Circular Economy Kędzia, G., Ocicka, B., Pluta-Zaremba, A., Raźniewska, M., Turek, J., & Wieteska-Rosiak, B. (2022). Social innovations for improving compostable packaging waste management in CE: A multi-solution perspective. Energies, 15(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239119

Climate Adaptation Rusanda, N., Indriana, H., & Falatehan, S. F. (2025). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam adaptasi terhadap perubahan iklim: Keberlanjutan Program Kampung Iklim (Proklim) di Desa Cibanteng. Jurnal Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29244/jskpm.v9i3.1505

Climate Change Mitigation Ismiartha, G. R., Santoso, R. S., & Hanani, R. (2021). Analisis stakeholders dalam kegiatan pengelolaan sampah Program Kampung Iklim (Proklim) sebagai upaya mitigasi perubahan iklim Dusun Soka, Desa Lerep, Kecamatan Ungaran Barat, Kabupaten Semarang. Journal of Management and Public Policy, 10(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.14710/jppmr.v10i2.30591

Collaborative Governance Pamungkas, W. A., & Yuwanto. (2025). Mapping collaborative governance in Indonesia Climate Village Program: A bibliometric analysis (2022–2025). Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2635

Community Empowerment Husna, K., & Yandra, A. (2023). ProKlim: Institutional data inventory assistance at site level. Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(1), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.31849/dinamisia.v7i1.13371

Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kota Madiun. (2025). Analisis strategi smart city Kota Madiun 2019-2024. Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kota Madiun.

Environmental Policy Sumanti, E. S., Prasetya, D. D., & Patmanthara, S. (2025). Integration of social, organizational, and technological factors to improve the effectiveness of environmental policies in waste management in Bima City. Emerging Information Science and Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/eist.v6i2.29171

Faedlulloh, D., Prasetyanti, R., & Irawan, B. (2019). Kampung versus climate change: The dynamics of community empowerment through the climate village program (Proklim). Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1424/1/012055

Firdaus, A. (2024). Inovasi sosial di hutan wakaf Bogor dalam mencapai pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 64–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v1i1.11918

Gardner, A., Greenblott, K., & Joubert, E. (2005). What we know about exit strategies: Practical guidance for developing exit strategies in the field. C-Safe Regional Learning Spaces Initiative.

Lestari, D. P., Falasifah, N., & Zakariya, A. F. (2024). Peran masyarakat dan pesantren dalam adaptasi dan mitigasi perubahan iklim di Desa Plumpang Kecamatan Plumpang Kabupaten Tuba. Journal of Community Development and Disaster Management, 6(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.37680/jcd.v6i2.6148

Lubis, H. D., & Putro, R. K. H. (2025). Analisis dampak lingkungan kerja operasional TPA terhadap kesehatan masyatakat di Desa Kaliabu, Kecamatan Mejayan, Kabupaten Madiun. Jurnal Teknik, 5(2), 1161–1177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51135/ryeev545

Maharani, H. S. (2025). Dampak sosial timbunan sampah terhadap kehidupan masyarakat sekitar pasar Kotaagung. Universitas Lampung.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Teaching Sociology (Vol. 30, Number 3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488

PT Pertamina Patra Niaga Fuel Terminal Madiun. (2025). Dokumen Inovasi Sosial: Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Proklim Pesanggrahan

Public Service Innovation Meričkova, B. M., Nemec, J., & Svidronova, M. (2015). Co-creation in local public services delivery innovation: Slovak experience. Lex Localis, 13(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.4335/13.3.521-535(2015)

Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2011). Research Methods for Social Workers. In Research Methods for Social Workers (Seventh Ed). Thomson Brooks/Cole. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44283-3

Sheik, A., Van Rooyen, D., & Mazzei, M. (2023). Social innovation in South Africa: building inclusive economies? Social Enterprise Journal, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-07- 2021-0060

Sistem Informasi Pengelolaan Sampah Nasional. (2026). Statistik Pengelolaan Sampah. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/

Social Enterprise Lombardi, M., & Costantino, M. (2020). A social innovation model for reducing food waste: The case study of an Italian non-profit organization. Administrative Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030045

Social Innovation Barsei, A. N., Giyatno, Wahyuni, N., & Atmoko, A. W. (2023). Social innovation in community-based household waste management in Ciamis Regency, West Java Province. Journal of Local Government Issues, 6(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v6i2.26479

Souza, A. C. A. A., de Lessa, B., & Lázaro da Silva Filho, J. C. (2019). Social innovation and the promotion of local economic development. Innovation and Management Review, 16(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-10-2018-0074

Suratman, Yuwono, A., Priyambada, I., Kusumandari, A., Santosa, D. H., Sudaryatno, Marwasta, D., Nurjani, E., Sekaranom, A. B., Hasanati, S., & Suarma, U. (2023). Gerakan aksi Proklim Indonesia 2020-2030. Gajah Mada University Press.

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Sukmayadevi, S., Akbar, L., Pentasandi, D. K., & Irawati, S. T. (2026). Social Innovation of the Climate Village Program (Proklim) as a Community-Based Waste Management Effort to Improve Welfare in Pesanggrahan, Madiun City. International Assulta of Research and Engagement (IARE), 4(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.70610/iare.1311